I have been a big fan of the President Donald Trump’s Twitter account for quite some time.
I thought his use of his favorite hashtag, #RUSSIA, was great.
I also thought he was smart.
And when he tweeted that his former secretary of state, Hilary Clinton, was under FBI investigation, I thought, “Whoa, this is really happening.”
So when it came to raising eyebrows, I was a little skeptical.
I was sure it was all just a joke.
And so it turns out it wasn’t.
But in the end, my skepticism was warranted.
I got a message from Trump’s personal Twitter account this week.
It was an angry message from a woman who was concerned about what he had said.
The tweet said: “If he wants to tweet about a very sensitive subject, I suggest he doesn’t do it.
He should just stop it.”
It didn’t specify the sensitive subject.
It went on to describe how she felt Trump’s actions had hurt her.
“He needs to stop tweeting and start writing,” she said.
This is a common tactic of Trump and his followers: to lash out at the person or topic at hand.
For example, they can lash out about a journalist, or an activist, or a politician.
But if you’re a Republican, this tactic has been used by Trump himself to criticize his own party and its leaders.
In the past, Trump has used this tactic in tweets about a number of people he’s been critical of.
But the tweet about Clinton came after Trump called her the “sick” person who “is not fit to be president.”
The tweet did not say who she was referring to.
But Trump himself has also used this technique.
For instance, he has used it to attack journalists who are critical of him.
In one tweet in October, he wrote, “Why did the fake media report that I attacked @CNN when the other night I was in New York, attacking a TV station?
They don’t care!”
And in November, he tweeted, “The Fake News Media is going crazy with their conspiracy theories about me.
The phony opposition is just a front for the Democrats and their paid liberal puppets.”
It is not uncommon for Trump supporters to lash these out at critics who are also critics of the president.
But when you look at the tweets that he has tweeted about Clinton in recent months, it’s not clear that this is the first time that Trump has tweeted these kinds of comments about her.
What is clear is that Trump, as a candidate, has used a number, even his own supporters, to attack the media.
In October, the President retweeted a tweet that said, “This week’s CNN ratings are down 25% over last year and that’s why the Fake News media is totally biased against me.
They are not paying attention.”
In November, the tweet said, “#CNN is not going anywhere.”
In December, he retweeted this tweet, which read, “CNN is going down in ratings.
Trump’s fake news is the reason.”
And in January, he posted a tweet saying, “Media is a cesspool, the Dems &roids, the FBI &roid, the swamp are the problems.
They don`t care.”
The most recent example of this tactic is the recent tweet from a man named Alexei Chubais.
In January, Trump wrote, “#Chubais, your recent tweet about @SenChubas was so vile and offensive that I decided to send it to you directly.”
This tweet did mention Chubas.
But it also specifically referenced Chubis and his wife, who is an immigrant from Russia.
He wrote, “‘I can tell you, if you had your way, Chubans family would be in jail.'”
That’s not the only time that Chubos has been the target of criticism from Trump supporters.
In May, a Twitter user named Alexey Kuzmin wrote, “@chubais you can’t be president without the Russian mafia, right?”
Trump responded by retweeting this tweet from the same user.
The original tweet was about an immigration case, not immigration.
But, the second tweet, when you read the context, it is clear that it was a direct reference to immigration from Russia, specifically to a Russian oligarch, Vladimir Yevtushenkov.
This tweet has been a constant source of criticism for Trump.
But this tweet is also a reference to an immigration matter.
“Trump, this week, you said ‘you can’t make the case about Russian money in your election,’ ” Kuzmon said.
The original statement was in response to a tweet from Chubus, who tweeted, “@Chubans, you know you can say whatever you want but you can`t get your message across without the money and